Technical Analysis Report

Autonomous System AS{{asn}}

Generated: {{generatedAt}}

Deep Technical Specification and Analysis

1. ASPA Technical Analysis

1.1 Adoption Status

Current Status: {{aspa.adoption_status}}

Parameter	Value
Provider Verification Readiness	{{aspa.provider_verification}}%
ASPA Readiness Score	{{aspa.readiness_score}}/100
Documentation Completeness	Pending Implementation

1.2 Implementation Roadmap

Complete provider attestations (Step 1)
Publish ASPA objects in RPKI repository (Step 2)
Validate upstream provider support (Step 3)
Monitor adoption metrics (Step 4)

2. RPKI Compliance Analysis

2.1 ROA Coverage

Metric	Value	Status
RPKI Compliance Score	{{healthScore.rpki}}/100	{{#if (gte healthScore.rpki 80)}}✓ Good{{else}}⚠ Needs Work{{/if}}
Invalid Routes Detected	{{threats.rpki_invalids}}	{{#if (eq threats.rpki_invalids 0)}}✓ None{{else}}⚠ Review{{/if}}

2.2 ROA Validation Process

RPKI Validation Chain:
├─ Fetch ROAs from RPKI Repository
├─ Validate Certificate Chain
├─ Check Origin ASN Authorization
├─ Verify Prefix Coverage
└─ Flag Invalid/Unknown Routes
    

3. BGP Stability and Routing

3.1 Route Stability Metrics

BGP Stability Score: {{healthScore.bgp_stability}}/100

Event Type	Count (24h)	Severity
Route Withdrawals	N/A	Standard
MOAS Events	{{threats.moas_events}}	{{#if (gt threats.moas_events 0)}}⚠ Monitor{{else}}✓ None{{/if}}
Anomalies	{{threats.anomalies_detected}}	{{#if (gt threats.anomalies_detected 0)}}⚠ Investigate{{else}}✓ None{{/if}}

3.2 Recommended Monitoring

BGP Update Frequency: Monitor for > 10 updates/minute
AS Path Length: Average < 5 hops
Prefix Churn: < 5% daily change
Origin AS Consistency: 100% match

4. Peering and Interconnection

4.1 Network Topology

Topology Metric	Value
IXP Connections	{{peering.ixp_connections}}
Direct Peers	{{peering.peer_count}}
Peer Policy: Open	{{peering.open_peers}}
Route Exports	{{peering.route_exports}}

4.2 Peering Recommendations

Evaluate IXP presence in secondary locations
Document peering policies in IRR (AS-SET)
Implement route filtering (prefix lists)
Monitor peer session stability (BFD)

5. Security Threat Assessment

5.1 Threat Summary

Threat Type	Detected	Risk Level
BGP Hijacks	{{threats.recent_hijacks}}	{{#if (eq threats.recent_hijacks 0)}}✓ Low{{else}}🔴 High{{/if}}
RPKI Invalid	{{threats.rpki_invalids}}	{{#if (eq threats.rpki_invalids 0)}}✓ Low{{else}}🟡 Medium{{/if}}
Anomalies	{{threats.anomalies_detected}}	{{#if (lte threats.anomalies_detected 2)}}✓ Low{{else}}🟡 Medium{{/if}}

5.2 Threat Mitigation

RPKI Validation: Implement route origin validation (ROV) to detect and filter invalid prefixes

ASPA Adoption: Provider verification prevents path spoofing attacks

6. Compliance and Standards

6.1 Standards Compliance

Standard	Status	Score
RFC 6811 (ROV)	Implementation Recommended	{{healthScore.rpki}}/100
RFC 9344 (ASPA)	{{aspa.adoption_status}}	{{healthScore.aspa}}/100
BCP 38 (Ingress Filtering)	Recommended	N/A

6.2 Data Sources

{{this}}

7. Technical Recommendations

→ {{this}}

8. Appendix: Methodology

8.1 Data Collection

Analysis performed using publicly available data from:

RIPE RIS Route Collectors
RouteViews BGP Archive
RPKI Repository Objects
PeeringDB Network Database
WHOIS RDAP Queries

8.2 Scoring Methodology

Health scores calculated using weighted metrics:

ASPA: 25% of overall score
RPKI: 25% of overall score
BGP Stability: 25% of overall score
Peering Health: 25% of overall score

8.3 Confidence Levels

All findings are based on publicly available network data. Internal network information not accessible via WHOIS/RDAP may affect accuracy.