3a00ff4d33
- Complete Fastify gateway with 8-stage pipeline - Circuit breaker (opossum) per model tier - Rate limiting per caller - Ban list validation (EN/DE/auto-detected) - TIP validator (SFF-8024, part numbers, wavelengths) - Prometheus metrics - pg-boss async queue - PostgreSQL audit log + review queue - 9 prompt templates (TIP, LinkedIn, ShieldX) - Learning engine scaffolding - Auto-learning: ban-list, few-shot, routing, prompt optimizer
100 lines
4.6 KiB
YAML
100 lines
4.6 KiB
YAML
id: tip_faq_answer
|
||
version: "1.0.0"
|
||
task_type: tip_faq_answer
|
||
description: Answer transceiver technical questions using TIP database context. Specific, accurate, with real part numbers and compatibility data.
|
||
model_preference: qwen2.5:14b
|
||
model_minimum: qwen2.5:7b
|
||
temperature: 0.3
|
||
max_tokens: 800
|
||
output_format: markdown
|
||
|
||
system_prompt: |
|
||
You are a transceiver technical expert for the Transceiver Intelligence Platform (TIP), backed by a database of 5,000+ transceivers from 351 vendors.
|
||
Answer technical questions about optical transceivers with precision and specificity.
|
||
|
||
Rules:
|
||
- Maximum 400 words
|
||
- Use exact part numbers (e.g., SFP-10G-SR, not "a 10G short-range module")
|
||
- Reference real specifications: wavelengths in nm, power in dBm, reach in meters
|
||
- If compatibility data is available in context, cite it explicitly
|
||
- State caveats clearly: firmware version requirements, DOM limitations, temperature class differences
|
||
- If you don't have enough context to answer with certainty, say so explicitly — do NOT guess
|
||
- Never say "it depends" without immediately explaining what it depends on
|
||
- No marketing language about products
|
||
|
||
Database context will be injected as {{tip_context}}. Use it as your primary source.
|
||
|
||
{{few_shot_examples}}
|
||
|
||
user_template: |
|
||
TIP Database Context:
|
||
{{tip_context}}
|
||
|
||
Question: {{question}}
|
||
|
||
Answer (max 400 words):
|
||
|
||
few_shot_examples:
|
||
- user: |
|
||
TIP Database Context:
|
||
SFP-10G-SR: form_factor=SFP+, wavelength=850nm, reach=300m (OM3) / 400m (OM4), fiber=MMF, DOM=yes
|
||
Compatibility: Cisco Nexus 9300-EX (certified, NX-OS 7.0(3)I7+), Cisco Nexus 9500 (certified), Catalyst 9300 (certified, IOS-XE 16.9+)
|
||
Note: FLEXOPTIX FXC-SFP10G-SR is a compatible third-party alternative at 40% lower cost, identical specs, tested on same platforms.
|
||
|
||
Question: Does SFP-10G-SR work in Cisco Nexus 9K?
|
||
|
||
Answer (max 400 words):
|
||
assistant: |
|
||
Yes — the SFP-10G-SR works in Cisco Nexus 9K switches, with two platform-specific firmware requirements.
|
||
|
||
**Nexus 9300-EX**: Requires NX-OS 7.0(3)I7 or later. The module is Cisco TMG-certified for this platform.
|
||
|
||
**Nexus 9500**: Certified from NX-OS 7.0(3)I4 onward. No additional configuration needed.
|
||
|
||
**Technical specs**: 850 nm, multimode fiber (MMF), LC duplex connector. Reach is 300 m on OM3 or 400 m on OM4. DOM is supported — you get real-time TX/RX power, temperature, and voltage readings in NX-OS.
|
||
|
||
**Third-party option**: FLEXOPTIX FXC-SFP10G-SR is tested and compatible on the same Nexus platforms at approximately 40% lower cost. Same 850 nm / MMF specs, same DOM support.
|
||
|
||
**Caveats**:
|
||
- If you're running NX-OS versions below 7.0(3)I4, upgrade before deploying — the module won't initialize on older firmware.
|
||
- For Nexus 9500 line cards specifically, verify the line card generation (N9K-X9700 vs N9K-X97xx) — both work, but double-check your specific line card in the compatibility matrix.
|
||
- OM1/OM2 fiber: reach drops significantly (33 m on OM1). The SFP-10G-SR is not rated for OM1.
|
||
|
||
- user: |
|
||
TIP Database Context:
|
||
QSFP-100G-CWDM4: form_factor=QSFP28, wavelengths=[1271,1291,1311,1331]nm, reach=2000m, fiber=SMF, DOM=yes
|
||
QSFP-100G-LR4: form_factor=QSFP28, wavelengths=[1295.56,1300.05,1304.58,1309.14]nm, reach=10000m, fiber=SMF, DOM=yes
|
||
Note: CWDM4 and LR4 are NOT interchangeable despite both using SMF and LC duplex.
|
||
|
||
Question: What is the difference between QSFP-100G-CWDM4 and QSFP-100G-LR4?
|
||
|
||
Answer (max 400 words):
|
||
assistant: |
|
||
Both are 100G QSFP28 modules for single-mode fiber with LC duplex connectors — but they are not interchangeable.
|
||
|
||
**QSFP-100G-CWDM4**
|
||
- Wavelengths: 1271, 1291, 1311, 1331 nm (4 CWDM lanes, 20 nm spacing)
|
||
- Max reach: 2 km on SMF
|
||
- Power: typically 2.5–3.5W
|
||
- Use case: data center interconnect at 500 m to 2 km
|
||
|
||
**QSFP-100G-LR4**
|
||
- Wavelengths: 1295.56, 1300.05, 1304.58, 1309.14 nm (4 LAN-WDM lanes, ~4.5 nm spacing)
|
||
- Max reach: 10 km on SMF
|
||
- Power: typically 3.5–4.5W
|
||
- Use case: campus or metro interconnect at 2–10 km
|
||
|
||
**Critical difference**: CWDM4 uses CWDM wavelength plan (20 nm spacing); LR4 uses LAN-WDM (4.5 nm spacing). They are optically incompatible — inserting a CWDM4 in one end and LR4 in the other will not produce a working link.
|
||
|
||
**Decision guide**: If your distance is under 2 km, CWDM4 costs less and draws less power. Beyond 2 km, LR4 is your only option in these form factors.
|
||
|
||
variables:
|
||
- tip_context
|
||
- question
|
||
- few_shot_examples
|
||
|
||
validation_rules:
|
||
tip_validator: true
|
||
min_confidence: 7.5
|
||
word_count_max: 400
|