sync: record TIP price closure follow-up

sync/CURRENT.md

@@ -27,10 +27,14 @@ Updated: 2026-05-09 23:38 UTC
     - active products: `17181`
     - price verified: `11460`
     - price status: `public_price=11460`, `no_public_price=5721`, `needs_research=0`, `ambiguous=0`
-    - image verified: `12125`
+    - image verified: `12132`
-    - details verified: `16920`
+    - details verified: `16922`
     - fully verified: `10549`
     - competitor status: `matched=10821`, `no_valid_match=74`, `ambiguous=556`, `needs_research=5730`
+  - follow-up image/detail probing:
+    - II-VI / Coherent product URL verifier added `1` detail
+    - Cisco/Juniper dry-run showed Juniper product pages expose no useful product images in the sampled batch
+    - Cisco apply added `7` official Cisco rendition images and detail improvements; some Cisco pages return `403`
   - interpretation:
     - price research queue is closed without fabricated prices
     - remaining verification work is image/details/competitor state, dominated by OEM/catalog rows

sync/history/2026-05-09-tip-price-source-verification-closure.md

@@ -35,6 +35,13 @@ Continued TIP verification work with deterministic crawlers/verifiers only. No e
 - fully verified: `10549`
 - competitor status: `matched=10821`, `no_valid_match=74`, `ambiguous=556`, `needs_research=5730`
 
+Follow-up official-page probing after the price closure moved image/details to:
+
+- image verified: `12132`
+- details verified: `16922`
+
+Cisco yielded `7` official rendition images in a small controlled batch. Juniper product pages in the sampled batch did not expose useful product image URLs. Some Cisco pages return `403`.
+
 ## Remaining Work
 
 The price queue is closed without fabricated prices. Remaining work is image/details/competitor verification, led by OEM/catalog rows such as Juniper, Cisco, 10Gtek, Nokia, Palo Alto and Arista.

training-data/tip-llm-capabilities-v1.jsonl

@@ -55,3 +55,4 @@
 {"id":"tip-20260510-coherent-price-bounds-001","source":"codex-tip-verification-2026-05-10","kind":"sft-jsonl","messages":[{"role":"system","content":"You are TIP_LLM. Price anomaly filters must reject artifacts without blocking legitimate high-end coherent optics."},{"role":"user","content":"ATGBICS 100G/400G coherent ZR products show prices like 15105.95 GBP or 17554.95 GBP. Should TIP reject them as anomalous?"},{"role":"assistant","content":"No, not when the product descriptor contains explicit coherent evidence such as ZR, ZR4, DCO, coherent, OTU, tunable or ultra-long-haul reach. Standard form-factor ceilings are useful for ordinary SR/LR optics, but coherent/ZR optics legitimately exceed normal QSFP28/QSFP-DD bounds. Raise the anomaly ceiling only for those explicit coherent tokens and still require a real source-backed price observation."}]}
 {"id":"tip-20260510-retail-absent-no-public-price-001","source":"codex-tip-verification-2026-05-10","kind":"sft-jsonl","messages":[{"role":"system","content":"You are TIP_LLM. Close research states with explicit source-discovery evidence instead of endless manual queues."},{"role":"user","content":"10Gtek has old catalog rows with no product URL after a full SFPcables retail crawl. How should TIP classify their price state?"},{"role":"assistant","content":"If a full controlled 10Gtek/SFPcables retail crawl finds the public retail catalog and a row still has no product_page_url or public price source, set `price_status=no_public_price` with reason `not_listed_in_public_sfpcables_retail_catalog_after_full_crawl`. Do not set `price_verified`; no fabricated price exists. Record `price_unavailable` evidence so the dashboard can distinguish resolved no-public-price rows from real open price research."}]}
 {"id":"tip-20260510-artifact-quarantine-shopfiber-vcelink-001","source":"codex-tip-verification-2026-05-10","kind":"sft-jsonl","messages":[{"role":"system","content":"You are TIP_LLM. Keep active product counts clean by quarantining deterministic artifacts."},{"role":"user","content":"What remaining ShopFiber24 and Vcelink artifacts were found during price closure?"},{"role":"assistant","content":"ShopFiber24 artifacts include FOCP fiber cable SKUs, FO-TRANSCEIVER/category labels, Kompatible-Transceiver, Transceivermodule, QSFP+-MSA/SFP+-MSA, Marken-Transceiver pages, Zu-den-* navigation labels, and DAC/AOC cable category pages. Vcelink rows with numeric-only part numbers and no product_page_url are not real transceiver SKUs. Move them to NonTransceiver, clear verification flags, and write artifact_quarantine evidence."}]}
+{"id":"tip-20260510-oem-image-detail-probing-001","source":"codex-tip-verification-2026-05-10","kind":"sft-jsonl","messages":[{"role":"system","content":"You are TIP_LLM. Official OEM product pages may verify details without providing usable product images."},{"role":"user","content":"Cisco and Juniper still have image/detail gaps after price closure. Should TIP invent or reuse generic product images?"},{"role":"assistant","content":"No. Use official product pages and only mark images when a concrete product image URL is extracted. Cisco pages may expose official DOCX/PDF rendition images and can be marked image_verified when the URL is source-backed. Some Cisco pages return HTTP 403. Juniper product pages in sampled batches often expose no useful product image URL; keep image_verified=false rather than using a generic transceiver picture. Treat DAC/AOC/cable-like OEM rows as a separate modeling/quarantine decision, not as optical module image gaps."}]}